{"id":752911,"date":"2025-11-17T07:00:00","date_gmt":"2025-11-17T13:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/oklahomawatch.org\/?post_type=newspack_nl_cpt&p=752911"},"modified":"2025-11-16T16:55:24","modified_gmt":"2025-11-16T22:55:24","slug":"oklahoma-supreme-court-will-weigh-initiative-petition-bill","status":"publish","type":"newspack_nl_cpt","link":"https:\/\/oklahomawatch.org\/newsletter\/oklahoma-supreme-court-will-weigh-initiative-petition-bill\/","title":{"rendered":"Oklahoma Supreme Court Will Weigh Initiative Petition Bill"},"content":{"rendered":"\n\n\n
\n\n\n

The Oklahoma Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on the constitutionality of Senate Bill 1027<\/a>, the legislation that added geographic restrictions and other hurdles to the state\u2019s initiative petition process, tomorrow morning at 10 a.m. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Supporters of the primary reform initiative petition State Question 836<\/a>, which is in the signature gathering phase, filed a lawsuit<\/a> against SB 1027 in June. They argue the legislation unduly burdens petitioners and therefore curtails free speech. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The high court granted the State Question 836 campaign\u2019s request for exemption from Senate Bill 1027, noting that the campaign began before the law took effect. Senate Bill 837, the unsuccessful effort to get a recreational marijuana question on the ballot, was the first campaign to operate under the new rules. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cSB1027’s signature caps limit signatures collected from any county to specific percentages of that county’s gubernatorial votes, effectively prohibiting other legal voters from signing the petitions once county limits are reached,\u201d the lawsuit reads. \u201cThis disenfranchisement directly contradicts the Constitution’s plain text that all legal voters shall have the right to propose initiatives and referenda.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The state maintains that the law should remain untouched, calling the petitioner\u2019s arguments flawed and hypothetical. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cA person in Tulsa County is just as statistically likely to be able to sign, meaningfully, a petition as a person in Cimarron County,\u201d the state\u2019s response reads. \u201cThis is a far cry from the unequal treatment of similarly situated individuals which is at the heart of equal protection challenges.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Several Democratic lawmakers noted the potential for litigation while debating against Senate Bill 1027 on the House and Senate floors. Sen. David Bullard, a Republican from Durant who ran Senate Bill 1027, responded that he was confident the bill would withstand any legal challenges. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Zach West, the Director of Special Litigation for the Attorney General\u2019s office, will argue on their behalf of the state. Attorney Randall Yates from the firm Crowe and Dunleavy will speak on behalf of the petitioners. They\u2019ll both have 20 minutes for arguments and rebuttals. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The hearing will take place in the Supreme Court Courtroom on the second floor of the State Capitol. Video recordings of arguments are generally made available<\/a> on the OSCN website. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

You can reach me at Kross@Oklahomawatch.org<\/a> with thoughts, questions or story ideas.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2014 Keaton Ross<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Recommended Reading<\/h4>\n\n\n\n